THE POWER OF LANGUAGE IN EFL CLASSROOM OF A SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Abstract
This research was aimed at investigating powerful utterances and bases power used by the teachers in the classroom interaction. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The data were collected through observation and analyzed by using the theory of speech act proposed Searle, then to know the power the data were analyzed according to the theory of power proposed by French and Raven. The result of the study showed that in the classroom interrogative directive speech as the most frequently produced by the teachers were very powerful to make the students actively participated in the classroom interaction. However, expert power as the power base that mostly occurred in the interaction made the students depend on the teachers to learn. Legitimate power and informational power that less occurred were the power needed to be used in the classroom to build the students internal motivation and independence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aidinlou, N. A., & Amineh, R. J. (20016). Students' Perception of Teachers' Power in High School, Universtity, and English Language Institute. International Journal of Linguistics; Vol.6, No. 6, 76-86.
Akdemir, A. S. (2016). Learning and Teaching: Theories, Approach and Models. Elazig: Firat University.
Anagaw, M., & Mossu, Y. (2019). Teacher Power in EFL Classroom: Associations with Classroom Interaction. Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics; Vol.59, 6-17.
Arikunto. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ary, D. (2001). Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Wadsworth Group.
Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. web.
Basra, S. M., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A Speech Act Analysis of Teacher Talk in an EFL Classroom. International Journal of Education,(10) 1, 73-78.
Baumgarten, S. (2009). Translating Hitler's "Mein Kompf": A Corpus - Aided Discourse Analytical Study. Searbrucken: VDM.
Budiasih, L. T., Andayani, & Rohmadi, M. (2016). Illocution on Speech Act of Foreign Students in Indonesian Learning. Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 6(2), 41-48.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Marisson, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education. 5th Edition. London: Rotledge Falmer.
Doyle, W., & Carter, K. (1984). Academic Tasks in Classsroom. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Duhita, A., & Zulaeha, I. (2018). The Politness Speech of Primary School Teacher in the Character Building of Learners. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 112-121.
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Printer Publisher Ltd.
Fin, A. (2012). Teacher use of procosial and antisocial power bases and students' percieved instructor understanding and missunderstanding in the college classroom. Communication Education, 61(1)1, 67-79.
French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power In D. Cartwright (Ed.). Studies in Social Power, 150 - 167.
French, J., & Raven, B. (1968). Group Dynamics. Reasearch and Theory, chapter Bases of Social Power.
French, J., & Raven, B. (1986). French and Raven's Power Bases: A Focus for Educational Researchers and Practitioners. Sage Journal, (30)3, 256-265.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York : Doubleday, Anchor.
Hancock, B., & Windridge, K. (2009). An Introduction of Qualitative Research. Brirmingham: University of Birmingham.
Handayani, T. K. (2016). Nilai-Nilai Karakter dalam Tindak Tutur Illocution dalam Buku WIR BESUCHEN EINE MOSCHEE. Litera Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, XV(2), 36.
Harujanen, E. (2011). Students' Consent to a Teacher's Pedagogical Authority. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 55(4), 403-424.
Hickey, P. R. (2014). Speech Act Theory.
Hurt, H., Scott, M., & McCroskey, J. (1984). Communication in the classroom. Reading , MA: Addison - Wisely.
Jackman, W. M. (2014). Teacher - Student Discourses, Power Brokerage and Classroom Engagement. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science; Vol. 4, No 7(1), 154-159.
Karney, P., Plax, T., Richmon, V., & McCroskey, J. (1984). Power in the Classroom IV: Alternatives to Discipline . Communication Year Book, 8, 724-746.
Kimchi, J., Polivika, B., & Stevenson, J. (1991). Triangulation: Operational Definition . Nursing Research 40(6), 364-366.
Levin A. (2010) Power and Politics: Speech Acts and Freedom of Expression. In:The Cost of Free Speech. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Martono, N. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Raya Grafindo Persada.
Maxcy, S. J. (1991). Educational Leadership: a critical pragmatics perspective. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
McCroskey, J., & Richmond, V. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and students perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175-184.
Nurhayati. (2010). Wacana Interaksi Kelas: Analisis Kritis Aspek dari Dimensi Sosial. Publikasi Ilmiah, 1-12.
Prasetyo, R. I., & Mulyani, M. (2018). Teacher's Directive Speech Acts in Teaching-Learning Interactions: Classroom Discourse Analysis. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(3), 213 - 221.
Quinn, P. (2006). Cooperative Learning and student Motivation. Education and Human Development Master's Theses.
Raven, B. (1992). A Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence: French and Raven Thirty Years Later. Journal of social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217-244.
Raven, B. H. (2008). The Bases of Power and the Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, (8).1, 1-22.
Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and Measuring a Power/Interactional Model of Interpersonal Influence. Journal of Applied Sosial Psychology,28, 307-332.
Raywid, M. (1995). The Subschools/Small SchoolsMovement - Taking Stocks.
Richmond, V. P., Davis, J., L.M, & Koontz, K. (1980). Percieved power as a mediator of management communication style and employee satisfaction: A preliminary investigation. Communication Quarterly, 28, 37-46.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Act. Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1999). Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. Phoenix: Guernsey Press Co.
Seken, K. (2015). Introduction to Pragmatics: A Course Book for Beginner, Firstq///' Printing. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sequeira, A. (2017). Introduction to Concept of Teaching and Learning.
Suhirman, L. (2016). Speech Act in Psycholiguistics Class Setting in Postgraduate Program. IJOLTL, 1(1), 19-38.
Sulistyani. (2017). The Power of Directive Speech Acts in EFL Classroom Interaction. Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017).
Sulistyowati, T. (2016). Teachers' Strategy in Maintaining Classroom Communication in Pre Service Class: A Functional Analysis. Presented: Language and Language Teaching Conference.
Swandewi, I., Ramendra, D., & Juniarta, P. A. (2016). An Analysis of Speech Acts Used by English Teacher in Classroom Teaching and Learning Process at SMA Negeri 2 Banjar.
Vlckova, K., Mares, J., & Jezek, S. (2015). Adaptation of Teacher Power Use Scale to Lower Secondary Students and Student Teachers. Pedagogicka orientace, 25 (6).
Vijayalakshmi, G. (2002). Factors Effecting Teacher Effectiveness. EduTracks 1(5), pp. 35-38.
Wodak, R., & Mayer, M. (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Baverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v8i2.3452
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh :
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia indexed by:
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.