PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ANALYZE, DESIGN, DEVELOP, IMPLEMENT, EVALUATE (ADDIE) TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP FISIKA SISWA
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perbedaan: (1) keterampilan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep antara siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran ADDIE dan konvensional (MPK), (2) keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran ADDIE dan MPK, dan (3) pemahaman konsep antara siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran ADDIE dan MPK. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain eksperimen post-test only control group design. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes pilihan ganda dan pilihan ganda diperluas. Data dianalisis dengan statistik deskriptif dan MANOVA satu jalur. Hasil penelitian terdapat: (1) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep antara siswa yang belajar dengan model ADDIE dan MPK (F=30,294; p<0,05), (2) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang belajar dengan model ADDIE dan MPK (F=40,286; p<0,05), (3) perbedaan pemahaman konsep antara siswa yang belajar dengan model ADDIE dan MPK (F=61,231; p<0,05), dengan uji lanjut menggunakan Least Significant Difference (LSD = 2,124; Δμ = 27,629).
Kata Kunci : model ADDIE, keterampilan berpikir kritis, pemahaman konsep
The purpose of this research was to analyze the differences of: (1) critical thinking skills and physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and conventional learning model (MPK), (2) critical thinking skills between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK, and (3) physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK. This research uses experimental design of posttest only control group design. Data were collected through multiple choice tests and a extended multiple choice test. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and one way MANOVA. It was found (1) there was significant differences of critical thinking skills and physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK (F = 30.294; p <0.05), (2) there was significant differences of critical thinking skills between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK (F = 40.286; p <0.05), (3) there was significant differences of physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK (F = 61.231; p <0,05), by LSD = 2,124; Δμ = 27,629.
keyword : ADDIE model, critical thinking skills, physics understanding
Kata Kunci : model ADDIE, keterampilan berpikir kritis, pemahaman konsep
The purpose of this research was to analyze the differences of: (1) critical thinking skills and physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and conventional learning model (MPK), (2) critical thinking skills between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK, and (3) physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK. This research uses experimental design of posttest only control group design. Data were collected through multiple choice tests and a extended multiple choice test. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and one way MANOVA. It was found (1) there was significant differences of critical thinking skills and physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK (F = 30.294; p <0.05), (2) there was significant differences of critical thinking skills between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK (F = 40.286; p <0.05), (3) there was significant differences of physics understanding between of students who study by using ADDIE and MPK (F = 61.231; p <0,05), by LSD = 2,124; Δμ = 27,629.
keyword : ADDIE model, critical thinking skills, physics understanding
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh :
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia indexed by:
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.